{"id":2178,"date":"2013-10-01T13:09:44","date_gmt":"2013-10-01T18:09:44","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-06T14:17:33","modified_gmt":"2023-01-06T19:17:33","slug":"harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/es\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\/","title":{"rendered":"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Case: Illinois Homecare Providers Challenge Unionization Scheme"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p>On June 30, 2014 the Supreme Court <a href=\"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/news\/u-s-supreme-court-strikes-down-illinois-homecare-provider-unionization-scheme-0\/\">struck down<\/a> Illinois&#8217; scheme to force mothers like Pam Harris and Susie Watts to pay forced fees to the SEIU as a condition of caring for their own children in their own homes, as part of a Medicaid program to provide care for children with significant disabilities.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court announced October 1, 2013 that it will hear the National Right to Work Foundation&#8217;s 17th case before the Court: <i>Harris v. Quinn<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p> The case stems from a legal challenge initiated by eight Illinois homecare providers with the help of National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys against executive orders issued by Illinois Governor Pat Quinn and his disgraced (and now incarcerated) predecessor, Rod Blagojevich.<\/p>\n<p>Quinn and Blagojevich issued executive orders aimed at forcing unwilling homecare providers into a union. Under the Governors&#8217; decrees, personal care providers are considered \u00abpublic employees\u00bb for the purposes of union organizing, a move that has since forced thousands of unwilling care providers into the SEIU&#8217;s forced dues-paying ranks.<\/p>\n<p><center><div class=\"videoContainer\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"420\" height=\"315\" src=\"\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/FK_ODo2f4NY\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div><\/center><\/p>\n<p>In <i>Harris<\/i>, the Court must decide if forcing homecare providers to affiliate with a union and subsidize union activities violates their rights to free expression and association.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the case on Tuesday, January 21, 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Below, you&#8217;ll find links to relevant legal documents, Foundation news releases, and notable media coverage.<\/p>\n<p>\n<b>NEWS RELEASES:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/en\/blog\/supreme-court-review-illinois-homecare-case-10012013\">Supreme Court to Review Illinois Homecare Provider Unionization Scheme<\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>LEGAL DOCUMENTS:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/sblog.s3.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/11-681-Harris-v.-Quinn-Petition.pdf\">Petition for a writ of certiorari filed 11\/29\/11<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/sblog.s3.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/11-681-Harris-v.-Quinn-SEIU-BIO.pdf\">Brief of respondent SEIU Healthcare Illinois and Indiana, et al. in opposition filed 02\/02\/12<\/a> <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/sblog.s3.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/11-681-Harris-v.-Quinn-Reply-1.pdf\">Reply of petitioners Pamela Harris, et al. filed 02\/16\/12<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/sblog.s3.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/11-681-Harris-v.-Quinn-Quinn-BIO.pdf\">Brief of respondent Pat Quinn, Governor of Illinois in opposition filed 04\/30\/2012<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/sblog.s3.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/11-681-Harris-v.-Quinn-Reply-2.pdf\">Reply of petitioners Pamela Harris, et al. filed 05\/10\/12<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/briefs-v3\/11-681_pet_amcu-cato.authcheckdam.pdf\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/briefs-v3\/11-681_pet_amcu-cato.authcheckdam.pdf\"><i>Amicus<\/i> brief filed by CATO, NFIB, and Mackinac Center filed 11\/27\/13<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/briefs-v3\/11-681_pet_amcu_ccj-etal.authcheckdam.pdf\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/briefs-v3\/11-681_pet_amcu_ccj-etal.authcheckdam.pdf\"><i>Amicus<\/i> brief filed by the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence and the Pacific Legal Foundation filed on 11\/27\/13<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/briefs-v3\/11-681_pet_amcu_ac-etal.authcheckdam.pdf\">Brief amici curiae of Albert Contreras, et al. filed on 11\/27\/13<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/publications\/supreme_court_preview\/briefs-v3\/11-681_pet_amcu_cpst_etal.authcheckdam.pdf\">Brief amici curiae of California Public School Teachers, et al. filed 11\/27\/13<\/a> <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/files\/nrtw\/11-681bsSEIU-HCII.pdf\">Brief of respondent SEIU Healthcare Illinois &#038; Indiana filed 12\/23\/13<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/files\/nrtw\/11-681_AFSCME_Council_31_and_SEIU Local 73.pdf\">Brief of respondents AFSCME Council 31, and SEIU Local 73 filed on 12\/23\/13<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/files\/nrtw\/11-681_bs_Pat Quinn.pdf\">Brief of respondent Pat Quinn, Governor of Illinois filed on 12\/23\/13<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/files\/nrtw\/11-681rb.pdf\">Reply of petitioners Pamela Harris, et al. filed 01\/14\/14<\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>MEDIA COVERAGE:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/washingtonexaminer.com\/meet-the-homemaker-who-could-end-illinois-push-to-unionize-home-health-care\/article\/2541669\"><i>Washington Examiner<\/i>: Meet the homemaker who could end Illinois&#8217; push to unionize home health care<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scotusblog.com\/case-files\/cases\/harris-v-quinn\/\">SCOTUSblog&#8217;s <i>Harris<\/i> page<\/a><\/p\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=FK_ODo2f4NY\">Fox Chicago Investigation<\/a><\/p>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The U.S. Supreme Court announced October 1, 2013 that it will hear the National Right to Work Foundation&#8217;s 17th case before the Court: <i>Harris v. Quinn<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p> The case stems from a legal challenge initiated by eight Illinois homecare providers with the help of National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys against executive orders issued by Illinois Governor Pat Quinn and his disgraced (and now incarcerated) predecessor, Rod Blagojevich.<\/p>\n<p>Quinn and Blagojevich issued executive orders aimed at forcing unwilling homecare providers into a union. Under the Governors&#8217; decrees, personal care providers are considered \u00abpublic employees\u00bb for the purposes of union organizing, a move that has since forced thousands of unwilling care providers into the SEIU&#8217;s forced dues-paying ranks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2178","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Case: Illinois Homecare Providers Challenge Unionization Scheme - National Right to Work Foundation<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Case: Illinois Homecare Providers Challenge Unionization Scheme - National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The U.S. Supreme Court announced October 1, 2013 that it will hear the National Right to Work Foundation&#039;s 17th case before the Court: Harris v. Quinn. The case stems from a legal challenge initiated by eight Illinois homecare providers with the help of National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys against executive orders issued by Illinois Governor Pat Quinn and his disgraced (and now incarcerated) predecessor, Rod Blagojevich.Quinn and Blagojevich issued executive orders aimed at forcing unwilling homecare providers into a union. Under the Governors&#039; decrees, personal care providers are considered &quot;public employees&quot; for the purposes of union organizing, a move that has since forced thousands of unwilling care providers into the SEIU&#039;s forced dues-paying ranks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"National Right to Work Foundation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-06T19:17:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nrtw.org\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nrtw.org\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\\\/\",\"name\":\"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Case: Illinois Homecare Providers Challenge Unionization Scheme - National Right to Work Foundation\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nrtw.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-10-01T18:09:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-06T19:17:33+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/nrtw.org\\\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nrtw.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nrtw.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"National Right to Work Foundation\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nrtw.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Case: Illinois Homecare Providers Challenge Unionization Scheme - National Right to Work Foundation","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Case: Illinois Homecare Providers Challenge Unionization Scheme - National Right to Work Foundation","og_description":"The U.S. Supreme Court announced October 1, 2013 that it will hear the National Right to Work Foundation's 17th case before the Court: Harris v. Quinn. The case stems from a legal challenge initiated by eight Illinois homecare providers with the help of National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys against executive orders issued by Illinois Governor Pat Quinn and his disgraced (and now incarcerated) predecessor, Rod Blagojevich.Quinn and Blagojevich issued executive orders aimed at forcing unwilling homecare providers into a union. Under the Governors' decrees, personal care providers are considered \"public employees\" for the purposes of union organizing, a move that has since forced thousands of unwilling care providers into the SEIU's forced dues-paying ranks.","og_url":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\/","og_site_name":"National Right to Work Foundation","article_modified_time":"2023-01-06T19:17:33+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tiempo de lectura":"4 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\/","url":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\/","name":"Harris v. Quinn Supreme Court Case: Illinois Homecare Providers Challenge Unionization Scheme - National Right to Work Foundation","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-10-01T18:09:44+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-06T19:17:33+00:00","inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/nrtw.org\/harris-v-quinn-supreme-court-case-illinois-homecare-providers-challenge-unionization-scheme\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/","name":"National Right to Work Foundation","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2178"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2178\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15548,"href":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2178\/revisions\/15548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrtw.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}