If "UNITE-HERE" union officials have their way, employees of Donald Trump’s new Windy City hotel may soon be hearing "you’re fired" if they refuse to pay union dues. According to Crain’s Chicago Business:

The Trump International Hotel & Tower offers both a high-profile target and an opportunity to bring 300 or more employees into the union fold. UNITE HERE wants Trump to approve a so-called neutrality agreement, which would permit organizers to try to persuade workers to sign cards supporting union representation.

So called "neutrality agreements"are anything but- they often require employers to assist union officials in organizing employees. Under such pacts, employers must often grant union organizers sweeping access to employees, hold "captive audience" meetings, and even hand out employees’ personal information.

Notice too as you read the article, as is common in many similar situations, that union officials are targeting the hotel’s employees rather than vice versa. Makes sense, since without a Right to Work law, union officials can force employees in Illinois to pay dues. Looks like it’s all about the forced-dues cash.

Today’s report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics confirms that efforts to sweep more workers into unionization through coercive "card check" organizing are paying off for union officials.

However, if Congress resurrects and passes mandatory "card check" legislation, workers will have even less say over whether they are unionized. Union officials will unleash a tidal wave of in-your-face organizing drives on America’s workers, and potentially millions more will be corralled into dues-paying union ranks.

Last week, we covered the United Auto Workers (UAW) union’s battle to become Foxwood Casino dealers’ monopoly bargaining agent. As the National Labor Relations Board continues its hearing on the validity of the unionization election, employees’ testimony of UAW union intimidation continues to roll in.

TheDay.com updates us on the story:

Others said they were either told directly or overheard union supporters telling dealers prior to the election that their jobs were in jeopardy if they voted against unionization.

True to form, many union organizers have no shame in dealing these casino workers a bad hand: the UAW’s back hand.

Remember, if you feel that union organizers have violated your rights, contact the National Right to Work Foundation toll-free at 800-336-3600 or visit this page to learn about your legal rights.

National Right to Work Foundation President Mark Mix details the Foundation’s efforts to help Sai Ly Acosta and other musicians in Hollywood after union officials indicated they would be arrested for showing up for rehearsal.

Brian Howard, a Toyota employee in Georgetown, Kentucky, who runs NoUAW.com to keep his workplace free of unwanted unionization, was featured over the weekend in the Cincinnati Enquirer.

"The UAW knows they do not have and will never have the votes to win an election," says Howard’s co-worker Marvin Robbins. "So they want to take the rights of the workers away and not have an election."

"The majority are sick of the harassment," Robbins said. "You would
think the UAW would get the message after 20 years, but they are so
desperate for membership they continue to show up where they are
clearly not wanted or needed."

UAW officials are among the most aggressive in using coercive "card check" unionization drives, as Right to Work Foundation-aided employee Mike Ivey can tell you. And if the Card Check Instant Organizing bill becomes the law of the land, not only will employees like Mr. Howard and Mr. Robbins have bull’s-eyes on their backs, but it will undermine the freedom to choose of all of their coworkers.

Montana timber trucker Michael Weller, who received free legal aid from National Right to Work Foundation attorneys, won an agreement that requires Teamsters Local 2 union officials to reimburse him all forced dues and initiation fees, plus interest.

The Associated Press reported:

Weller said he paid the [forced dues] charges out of fear of losing his job, and sought financial disclosure documents from the union to determine if he was paying the correct amount.

However, even though it was an encouraging victory for Weller, without a Right to Work law in Montana, there are countless more workers who are forced to pay hundreds of dollars to an unwanted union each year or lose their jobs.

The Daily Inter Lake and the Flathead Beacon also covered Weller’s victory.

A Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial today highlights the importance of the National Right to Work Foundation’s Beck U.S. Supreme Court victory.

Unfortunately, union officials commonly ignore and violate that principle, as borne out by the number of Beck enforcement cases the Foundation has. However, the article recognizes that as a Right to Work state, employees can go beyond cutting off union dues for politics.

With union officials in this context squabbling over which candidate to support, employees in Nevada deserve to know that they can not only cut off their dues going towards union political activities- they are free to pay none at all.

The National Right to Work Foundation just filed a "friend of the court" brief supporting employee free choice at the U.S. Supreme Court in the Chamber v. Brown case. At issue is a controversial 9th Circuit decision that basically forces coercive union organizing on private companies receiving state funds.

Foundation attorneys have successfully helped contest similiar laws in Wisconsin, and through this brief in New York. Additionally, with 13 trips to the U.S. Supreme Court on record, most recently the 2007 Davenport defensive victory, Foundation attorneys are no strangers to the highest court in the land.

Since last spring, United Auto Workers (UAW) union officials have had Foxwoods Resort Casino workers in its sights. Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation runs Foxwoods Resort Casino, which happens to be one of the most successful casinos in the world.

Following an election held in November, Foxwoods filed unfair labor practices at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)—citing a whopping 12 objections to the UAW union’s organizing tactics.

TheDay.com has the story:

The tribe also questioned why the ballots were not multilingual and alleged that UAW representatives harassed and intimidated eligible voters before the election.

Sadly, it’s all too common for union organizers to mislead or even harass employees during a unionization drive.

With the charges, the NLRB began its hearings over the dispute yesterday. A casino employee described the UAW union’s threatening tactics:

…one dealer…“was chased by car out of the employee parking lot and almost forced into a concrete barrier.”

The outcome of the NLRB hearing could have national implications, as union officials could be granted monopoly bargaining privileges over the largest tribal casino in the nation—leaving the door open for the UAW union (and others) to sink their teeth in at other tribal casinos.

Following up on last week’s post, Stan Greer of the National Institute for Labor Relations Research spoke out last week against a recent executive order in Colorado extending union monopoly bargaining over state employees. (NRTW Foundation Vice President and Legal Director Raymond J. LaJeunesse, Jr. spoke at the event.)

According to an article in the Denver Business Journal:

Greer also said that even if legislators approve a law prohibiting
government workers from striking — and Ritter signs it — 48 percent
of public sector strikes are technically illegal, meaning that
legislation is not an effective deterrent against strikes.

"By all economic measures, Colorado would be better off without
forced dues and fees and everyone would be better off with right to
work laws."

How true- if strike prohibitions work, how did union officials shut down New York City just before Christmas in 2005″ They didn’t seem to mind the illegality of that strike. The imposition of forced union dues has also prompted state employees in Washington and Maine to fight back.