Teacher Files State Complaints After Union Bosses Violate Act 10, U.S. Constitution
Madison, WI (September 21, 2012) – A former Greenwood, Wisconsin teacher has filed complaints against a local teacher union for illegally refusing to honor her right under the state law commonly referred to as “Act 10” to refrain from union dues payments, and for refusing to follow constitutional disclosure requirements.
Amy Anaya filed the complaint with the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission with free legal assistance from National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys.
Anaya was a School District of Greenwood teacher for a year, beginning in August 2011, after Act 10 became effective. In September 2011, Greenwood Education Association (GEA) union officials approached Anaya and illegally told her that she “had to” sign the union’s membership form. Anaya informed them that she had no desire to become a member of the union.
In December 2011, GEA union officials again demanded that Anaya join the union, and Anaya again informed them that she was not interested in joining.
Under Wisconsin’s Act 10 public-sector unionism reforms, Anaya, as a nonmember, had the right to refrain from paying any union dues or fees as a condition of her employment.
Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court has long held that a worker has a First Amendment right to refrain from formal union membership at any time. Additionally, any worker who refrains from union membership cannot be required to pay union dues spent for union activities like political activism, lobbying, and member-only events. Nonmember workers are entitled to an independently-audited breakdown of union expenditures and the chance to challenge any forced dues or fees before an impartial third party.
Despite Act 10 and the union’s failure to provide these constitutional protections, the school district deducted full union dues from Anaya’s paychecks for the whole year, totaling to about $750.
“Teacher union bosses and school officials ignored state law and U.S. Supreme Court precedent to illegally coerce this teacher into full-dues-paying union ranks against her will,” said Mark Mix, President of National Right to Work. “This case underscores just how important Act 10 is in protecting Wisconsin public employees from forced unionism abuses such as this.”
“No worker should ever be forced to pay union dues or fees as a condition of employment,” added Mix.
Worker’s Federal Charge Forces Union Officials to Halt Intimidation Tactics
Johnsonburg, PA (September 14, 2012) – A Johnsonburg Clarion Sintered Metals worker’s federal charge against a Machinist union local has forced union officials to stop threatening workers who want to exercise their right to refrain from formal union membership.
Christina Wilson filed the federal unfair labor practice charge against International Association of Machinists (IAM) Local 2448 with free legal assistance from the National Right to Work Foundation.
IAM Local 2448 union officials enjoy monopoly bargaining privileges over Wilson’s workplace. Because Pennsylvania does not have a Right to Work law, workers can be forced to pay union dues or fees to keep their jobs. However, the U.S. Supreme Court held in the Foundation’s Communications Workers of America v. Beck case that workers cannot be compelled to pay for union political activities, lobbying, and member-only events.
Additionally, union officials are required to provide an independently-audited breakdown of union expenditures to make it less difficult for workers to hold union bosses accountable for their spending.
IAM Local 2448 union officials demanded that Wilson and other nonmember workers who timely resigned from membership before the contract went into effect pay an initiation fee and threatened that if they did not pay, they would be fired. IAM union officials also have not followed the federal disclosure requirements.
Union officials finally backed down after Wilson filed the federal charge with the NLRB.
“Christiana Wilson had to take the courageous step to file a federal charge to stop local Machinist union bosses from illegally threatening to fire workers who had the temerity to exercise their right to refrain from union membership,” said Mark Mix, President of National Right to Work. “Pennsylvania desperately needs a Right to Work law to prevent these types of forced unionism abuses from occurring in the future.”
Twenty-three states have Right to Work protections for their workers upholding the principle of voluntary union affiliation.
California Nurse Union Booted Out of McAllen, TX Hospital
California Nurse Union Booted Out of McAllen, TX Hospital
Worker advocate thwarts union boss scheme to coercively interrogate independent-minded nurse
McAllen, TX (September 10, 2012) – With free legal assistance from National Right to Work Legal Foundation staff attorneys, a group of McAllen nurses have succeeded in removing a California-based union from their workplace.
About two years ago, National Nurses Organizing Committee (NNOC) union officials entered into a “neutrality agreement” with Rio Grande Regional Hospital and its parent company, HCA Holdings, designed to grease the skids for the nurses’ unionization. Such agreements give union organizers access to workers in the workplace, workers’ home addresses and other personal information, and impose gag rules on what company managers can say about the union.
NNOC union bosses unionized the nurses after conducting a stealth organizing campaign under the neutrality agreement. But a tenacious group of nurses led by Victoria Lynn Glass, RN, filed for a decertification election with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and in July 2012 successfully voted the union out of their hospital by a tally of 156-128.
California Nurse Union Booted Out of McAllen, TX Hospital
McAllen, TX (September 10, 2012) – With free legal assistance from National Right to Work Legal Foundation staff attorneys, a group of McAllen nurses have succeeded in removing a California-based union from their workplace.
About two years ago, National Nurses Organizing Committee (NNOC) union officials entered into a “neutrality agreement” with Rio Grande Regional Hospital and its parent company, HCA Holdings, designed to grease the skids for the nurses’ unionization. Such agreements give union organizers access to workers in the workplace, workers’ home addresses and other personal information, and impose gag rules on what company managers can say about the union.
NNOC union bosses unionized the nurses after conducting a stealth organizing campaign under the neutrality agreement. But a tenacious group of nurses led by Victoria Lynn Glass, RN, filed for a decertification election with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and in July 2012 successfully voted the union out of their hospital by a tally of 156-128.
NNOC bosses filed “objections” to the election with the NLRB. However, rather than litigate their objections publicly under NLRB election rules, the union bosses simultaneously invoked a private “arbitration” procedure created by the HCA-NNOC pact and held a “hearing” on the objections before an “arbitrator” handpicked by union officials and the company.
Making a further mockery of the NLRB’s election rules, NNOC union officials subpoenaed Glass to appear and testify under oath about the campaign to remove the union from her workplace. She was also directed to produce for union inspection all documents that the nurses created in their election campaign to oppose the NNOC union bosses.
In response, Foundation staff attorneys filed federal charges against NNOC and Rio Grande/HCA challenging the crude attempt to coercively interrogate Glass about her legally protected activities. Due to her representation by Foundation attorneys, Glass neither testified in the union-boss “arbitration” hearing nor produced a single document demanded by the union.
On September 6, 2012, NNOC union officials were forced to drop their objections to the nurses’ decertification election and the NLRB Region in Texas certified the vote.
“So-called ‘neutrality agreements’ like this one between union officials and hospital management give union bosses license to browbeat and intimidate workers into acceding to unionization,” said Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Foundation. “These nurses endured union boss harassment and kangaroo courts to ultimately exercise their right to remove the unwanted union from their workplace.”
Nurses Challenging Forced Unionization Deal by Union Organizers and Company Management
Nurses Challenging Forced Unionization Deal by Union Organizers and Company Management
Union organizers’ intimidation sways outcome of unionization election
Massillon, OH (September 10, 2012) – Two local Affinity Medical Center nurses are seeking to overturn a union certification election after experiencing union intimidation that tainted the results.
With free legal assistance from the National Right to Work Foundation, Affinity nurses Susan Kelley and Cinda Keener filed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) a motion to intervene in the election proceedings in their workplace.
National Nurses Organizing Committee (NNOC) union organizers and Affinity Medical Center management entered into a “neutrality agreement” that gave union organizers preferential access to the facility helping them to impose monopoly bargaining on the nurses. Company and union officials refuse to disclose the terms of the secret agreement despite requests from the nurses
Nurses Challenging Forced Unionization Deal by Union Organizers and Company Management
Massillon, OH (September 10, 2012) – Two local Affinity Medical Center nurses are seeking to overturn a union certification election after experiencing union intimidation that tainted the results.
With free legal assistance from the National Right to Work Foundation, Affinity nurses Susan Kelley and Cinda Keener filed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) a motion to intervene in the election proceedings in their workplace.
National Nurses Organizing Committee (NNOC) union organizers and Affinity Medical Center management entered into a “neutrality agreement” that gave union organizers preferential access to the facility helping them to impose monopoly bargaining on the nurses. Company and union officials refuse to disclose the terms of the secret agreement despite requests from the nurses
Additionally, non-employee union organizers stalked, reported on, and attempted to get company management to retaliate against nurses who exercised their rights to oppose the unionization of their workplace.
Although the exact terms of this secret deal are unknown, neutrality agreements between union and company officials often grant union organizers wide-ranging access to employee break rooms, lounges, and other company facilities in exchange for contract concessions or to prevent union-boss instigated protests against the company. Moreover, company supervisors are often gagged from discussing unionization with concerned employees.
The two nurses point out that the secret deal between Affinity and NNOC union officials, combined with the intimidation of nurses who spoke out against unionization, likely affected the outcome of the union organizing vote. Witnesses report that the NNOC union was granted monopoly bargaining powers over the workers by a single vote.
“Caught between union bosses and corporate executives, these nurses have been stripped of their rights to oppose forced unionism in their workplace,” said Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Foundation. “Medical professionals shouldn’t be subjected to backroom deals that give union operatives preferential treatment at the expense of employees’ workplace rights.”
“Upholding this process would make a sham out of federal labor law, which is supposed to protect workers,” added Mix. “The NLRB should give these nurses a say in what is going on in their workplace.”
SEIU Officials Face State Prosecution for Violating Pharmacist’s Rights
SEIU Officials Face State Prosecution for Violating Pharmacist’s Rights
Case shows desperate need for California Right to Work law
San Jose, CA (September 6, 2012) – Last week, the California Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) filed a complaint against a local union for illegally refusing to honor a worker’s right to refrain from full-dues-paying union membership.
With free legal assistance from National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center pharmacist Jeffrey Lum of Cupertino filed a state charge in June against Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 521 for illegally forcing him into full union dues payments.
Lum, a county employee, exercised his right to refrain from formal union membership in November 2011 and sent a letter to the SEIU notifying the union hierarchy of his decision.
SEIU Officials Face State Prosecution for Violating Pharmacist’s Rights
San Jose, CA (September 6, 2012) – Last week, the California Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) filed a complaint against a local union for illegally refusing to honor a worker’s right to refrain from full-dues-paying union membership.
With free legal assistance from National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center pharmacist Jeffrey Lum of Cupertino filed a state charge in June against Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 521 for illegally forcing him into full union dues payments.
Lum, a county employee, exercised his right to refrain from formal union membership in November 2011 and sent a letter to the SEIU notifying the union hierarchy of his decision. Because California does not have Right to Work protections making union affiliation completely voluntary, workers who refrain from formal union membership can still be forced to pay part of union dues to keep their jobs. However, nonmember workers cannot be required to pay union dues spent for union activities like political activism, lobbying, and member-only events.
SEIU Local 521 officials acknowledged Lum’s resignation letter but still continue to extract full union dues from his paychecks – claiming Lum’s resignation from formal union membership did not meet the union’s criteria. Under California state law and federal case law, workers have the unconditional right to refrain from formal union membership.
Lum’s charge sought an acknowledgment from union officials that he is no longer a formal member, an independently-audited breakdown of union expenditures, a refund of illegally-seized forced union dues from his paychecks dating back to January, and the posting of notices in the workplace informing workers of their right to refrain from union membership.
The PERB investigated and found merit to Lum’s charge. The PERB Office of the General Council filed the complaint against the SEIU and the union has 20 days to respond.
“SEIU bosses are ignoring Supreme Court precedent and creating purposefully complicated rules to illegally coerce workers into full-dues-paying union ranks against their will,” said Mark Mix, President of National Right to Work. “To prevent these types of forced unionism abuses in the future, California desperately needs to pass a Right to Work law making union affiliation and dues payments completely voluntary.”
Twenty-three states have Right to Work protections for workers. Recent public polling shows that 80 percent of Americans and union members support the Right to Work principle of voluntary unionism.
Labor Day Statement: “Union Officials Are Mounting A Billion Dollar Campaign to Reelect President Barack Obama”
Labor Day Statement: “Union Officials Are Mounting A Billion Dollar Campaign to Reelect President Barack Obama”
Forced-dues funded billion dollar machine enables union officials to wield immense political clout, even though voluntary union membership continues to steadily decline
Washington, DC (August 31, 2012) – Mark Mix, President of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and National Right to Work Committee, released the following statement regarding this year’s Labor Day holiday.
“This Labor Day, many workers will enjoy a well-deserved long weekend. But as we celebrate with friends and family, union officials are mounting a billion dollar campaign to reelect President Barack Obama and elect more pro-forced unionism allies in Congress.
“Throughout the United States, tens of millions of American workers are already compelled to pay dues or fees to union officials as a condition of getting or keeping a job. And millions more workers are required by law to accept a union’s so-called ‘representation,’ even if they would rather negotiate with their employer themselves on their own merits.
“Recently, the Wall Street Journal reported that Big Labor spends about four times on politics and lobbying than what was previously thought. This forced-dues funded billion dollar machine enables union officials to wield immense political clout, even though voluntary union membership continues to steadily decline.”
Labor Day Statement: “Union Officials Are Mounting A Billion Dollar Campaign to Reelect President Barack Obama”
Washington, DC (August 31, 2012) – Mark Mix, President of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and National Right to Work Committee, released the following statement regarding this year’s Labor Day holiday.
“This Labor Day, many workers will enjoy a well-deserved long weekend. But as we celebrate with friends and family, union officials are mounting a billion dollar campaign to reelect President Barack Obama and elect more pro-forced unionism allies in Congress.
“Throughout the United States, tens of millions of American workers are already compelled to pay dues or fees to union officials as a condition of getting or keeping a job. And millions more workers are required by law to accept a union’s so-called ‘representation,’ even if they would rather negotiate with their employer themselves on their own merits.
“Recently, the Wall Street Journal reported that Big Labor spends about four times on politics and lobbying than what was previously thought. This forced-dues funded billion dollar machine enables union officials to wield immense political clout, even though voluntary union membership continues to steadily decline.
“Today, union officials are going all out to obtain even more special privileges to further expand their forced-dues-paying ranks. Meanwhile, many workers feel they have little choice but to pay for Big Labor’s election campaigning, and many workers are unaware of their right to object.
“That’s why the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation is providing free legal aid to thousands of employees nationwide seeking to get their money back. In fact, Foundation attorneys recently won a precedent-setting victory at the U.S. Supreme Court establishing for the first time that union officials must obtain affirmative consent from workers before using workers’ forced union fees for union politicking.
“This victory is an important step in the right direction and underscores the importance of holding politicians accountable on the issue of forced unionism in the coming national elections. The National Right to Work Committee is mobilizing its 2.6 million members to call on candidates to support greater workplace freedoms, including supporting the National Right to Work Act.”