<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>monopoly bargaining</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/monopoly-bargaining</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Workers&#039; Rights Are At Stake in Labor Battles Nationwide, But Not in the Way Union Bosses Claim</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/whats-really-at-stake-03142011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last week, Mark Mix, President of National Right to Work, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/565192/201103071839/The-Real-Issue-In-Labor-Battle.aspx&quot;&gt;pointed out&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;i&gt;Investor&#039;s Business Daily&lt;/i&gt; that the real issue in the ongoing battles between Big Labor and reform-minded public officials in various states across the country is getting lost in the union bosses&#039; self-serving rhetoric.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/565192/201103071839/The-Real-Issue-In-Labor-Battle.aspx&quot;&gt;As Mix notes&lt;/a&gt;, given the media coverage of the battle in Wisconsin:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/whats-really-at-stake-03142011&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/whats-really-at-stake-03142011#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:28:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3901 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Renegade Lame Duck Congress Votes on Police/Fire Union Bargaining Mandate</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/renegade-lame-duck-congress-votes-police-fire-bill-12082010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Today, Mark Mix, President of National Right to Work &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/dec/7/lame-ducks-paying-their-unions-dues/?page=1&quot;&gt;was published&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;i&gt;Washington Times&lt;/i&gt; regarding today&#039;s U.S. Senate vote on Senator Harry Reid&#039;s Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill (S. 3991).  Despite voters sending a clear message to Washington last month, it appears some pro-forced unionism senators didn&#039;t quite get the message:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	If Mr. Reid cared one whit for what ordinary Americans think, he would respond to such electoral drubbings for his fellow Big Labor Democrats and GOP fellow travelers by backing away from federally mandated union-boss control over public-safety officers. Instead, he announced over the weekend that he will file for cloture and force a vote on this draconian bill on Wednesday. Among those voting will be 14 defeated or retiring senators who won&#039;t be back in January.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/renegade-lame-duck-congress-votes-police-fire-bill-12082010&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/renegade-lame-duck-congress-votes-police-fire-bill-12082010#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:22:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3869 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Michigan Child Care Providers Take Their Case to the Airwaves</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/michigan-child-care-providers-fox-news-10012110</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
As we &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/forced-unionization-travesty-09172010&quot;&gt;recounted earlier this month&lt;/a&gt;, National Right to Work Foundation attorneys &lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2010/02/michigan-home-care-providers-file-class-action-suit-02172010&quot;&gt;are fighting&lt;/a&gt; a blatant political payback scheme initiated by Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm to hand over all home-based child-care providers who provide services to state-subsidized low-income families over to government union bosses.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last week, Mark Mix, President of National Right to Work, and Carrie Schlaud, the courageous lead plaintiff of the providers&#039; class-action lawsuit against Granholm and the United Autoworker (UAW) and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) unions appeared on the Fox News Channel&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Fox &amp;amp; Friends&lt;/i&gt; to discuss the case:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/michigan-child-care-providers-fox-news-10012110&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/michigan-child-care-providers-fox-news-10012110#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:52:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3719 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mark Mix in the Washington Examiner: When Big Labor plays with fire, taxpayers get burned</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/mark-mix-in-washington-examiner-public-sector-unionism-07092010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Earlier this week, Mark Mix, President of National Right to Work, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/Mark-Mix-When-Big-Labor-plays-with-fire-taxpayers-get-burned-98028664.html&quot;&gt;was published&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;i&gt;Washington Examiner&lt;/i&gt; warning about the threat the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/&quot;&gt;Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill&lt;/a&gt; (pdf), which just passed the House last week, poses not only public safety workers&#039; rights, but also state and community budgets. As we &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/charleston-wv-mayor-police-fire-monopoly-barg&quot;&gt;noted before&lt;/a&gt;, public officials across the country are waking up to the fact that public sector forced unionism is behind the financial crises in their communities.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
From Mark Mix&#039;s commentary:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/mark-mix-in-washington-examiner-public-sector-unionism-07092010&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/mark-mix-in-washington-examiner-public-sector-unionism-07092010#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:07:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3805 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jim DeMint: &quot;Let&#039;s keep our focus at TSA on security, not politics.&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/jim-demint-lets-keep-our-01072010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Pro-Right to Work Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) has a post up on RedState explaining how monopoly bargaining for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees could interfere with the agency&#039;s ability to effectively respond to threats.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
DeMint points out that union monopoly control of border patrol agents, and the wasteful and inefficient rules preferred by the union bosses, has made it difficult for the government to discipline, reassign, or terminate employees.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To best protect our national security, the government must have the resources to remove egregious offenders from the positions and allocate resources as efficiently as possible.  DeMint outlines how monopoly bargaining for TSA agents could weaken our national security:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/jim-demint-lets-keep-our-01072010&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/jim-demint-lets-keep-our-01072010#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:41:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Cote</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3675 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fact Sheet: States with High Rate of Union Monopoly Bargaining Suffering a Horrific &quot;Lost Decade&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/union-boss-monopoly-bargaining-hinders-job-growth-09282409</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last week, the pro-worker think tank &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/&quot;&gt;National Institute for Labor Relations Research&lt;/a&gt; (NILRR) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/node/96&quot;&gt;released&lt;/a&gt; a Fact Sheet entitled “Negative Employment Growth Since November 2001” that details how highly-unionized states are suffering a &amp;quot;lost decade&amp;quot; in terms of private-sector job growth, while the least-unionized states have benefited from a nearly 1.5 million private-sector job growth:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	As of 2001, the year of the last national recession prior to the current one, 9.7% of private-sector employees nationwide were under “exclusive” union representation.  But in 16 states – Alaska, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania,. Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin – 11.0% or more of private-sector workers were unionized.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/union-boss-monopoly-bargaining-hinders-job-growth-09282409&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/union-boss-monopoly-bargaining-hinders-job-growth-09282409#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:36:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3593 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Right to Work Experts in the News: Labor Day Highlights Injustices of Compulsory Unionism</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-experts-honor-workers-labor-day-09092209</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Experts from the National Right to Work &lt;a href=&quot;/&quot;&gt;Foundation&lt;/a&gt; and Right to Work &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtwc.org/&quot;&gt;Committee&lt;/a&gt; took to the airwaves and opinion pages across America to remind us what Labor Day is really about —  the individual worker.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mark Mix, president of National Right to Work, reminded Americans that &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/mark-mix-its-labor-day-not-union-day&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;It&#039;s &#039;Labor&#039; Day, Not &#039;Union&#039; Day&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; in his nationally published op-ed which appeared in over 20 newspapers across the country.   In his article, Mix offers a stouthearted rebuke to the usual union boss propaganda which has become commonplace on Labor Day:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This Labor Day, big labor bosses will dish out their usual Labor Day propaganda about how awful our lives would supposedly be without them.  The reality is that millions of workers and indeed our economy are continuing to suffer greatly under the scourge of compulsory unionism.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-experts-honor-workers-labor-day-09092209&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-experts-honor-workers-labor-day-09092209#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:40:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3577 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fact Sheet: Union Monopoly Privileges Linked to Lower Earnings and Disposable Incomes for Workers</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/nilrr-union-monopoly-linked-lower-purchasing-power-08282009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Contrary to the usual propaganda union bosses would like you to believe, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/&quot;&gt;National Institute for Labor Relations Research&lt;/a&gt; (NILRR) -- an anti-compulsory unionism think tank that exposes the harm forced unionism inflicts on workers -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/node/95&quot;&gt;released&lt;/a&gt; a report today entitled &amp;quot;Union Monopoly Linked to Lower Purchasing Power&amp;quot; that details how workers in least-unionized states enjoy the benefits of higher cost-of-living-adjusted earnings and disposable incomes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You see, not only does government-granted union monopoly bargaining privileges infringe on employees&#039; individual liberty, it also harms employees&#039; economic interests.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to NILRR:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/nilrr-union-monopoly-linked-lower-purchasing-power-08282009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/nilrr-union-monopoly-linked-lower-purchasing-power-08282009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:12:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3571 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pro-Worker Think Tank: Big Labor Pushing Dangerous Public Safety Monopoly Bargaining Mandate</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/NILRR-police-and-firefighter-monopoly-bargaining-bill-07222809</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/&quot;&gt;National Institute for Labor Relations Research&lt;/a&gt; (NILRR) has just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/node/93&quot;&gt;published&lt;/a&gt; an eye-opening fact sheet revealing the dangers of Big Labor&#039;s latest push to use the U.S. Congress &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/White-House-gives-public-safety-unions-clout-to-intimidate-7927903-49981732.html&quot;&gt;to impose&lt;/a&gt; union monopoly bargaining and forced dues on public safety workers in cash-strapped states and localities.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/NILRR-police-and-firefighter-monopoly-bargaining-bill-07222809&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/NILRR-police-and-firefighter-monopoly-bargaining-bill-07222809#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:12:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3550 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Employees Force Settlement in Precedent-Setting Federal Union Racketeering Lawsuit</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/employees-force-settlement-precedent-setting-suit-07222009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/employees-force-settlement-precedent-setting-suit-07222009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/employees-force-settlement-precedent-setting-suit-07222009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:22:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3554 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

