<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Top Down Organizing</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A Bigger Big Labor?</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/new-big-labor-conglomerate-04102109</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
To regular readers of &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog&quot;&gt;Freedom@Work&lt;/a&gt;, it&#039;s certainly no secret that Big Labor&#039;s union bosses, in the face of greater difficulty in winning workers over voluntarily, are always working to come up with &lt;a href=&quot;/neutrality/info&quot;&gt;new schemes&lt;/a&gt; to force workers into full-dues-paying union membership.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of course, one major way union bosses get around this inconvenient truth is &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/right-work-podcast-episode-2-big-labors-polit-10242008&quot;&gt;to use workers&#039; forced dues for politics&lt;/a&gt;, essentially &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/seiu-blagovichs-back-pocket-years-12092108&quot;&gt;buying&lt;/a&gt; political power &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/top-down-union-organizing-drive-01072009&quot;&gt;to steer&lt;/a&gt; our already intrusive Federal government &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/top-10-things-big-labors-agenda-12102008&quot;&gt;toward coercive policy&lt;/a&gt; to force more workers into union ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/new-big-labor-conglomerate-04102109&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/new-big-labor-conglomerate-04102109#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/big-labor">Big Labor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/card-check">Card Check</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/compulsory-unionism">compulsory unionism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/efca">EFCA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/employee-free-choice-act">Employee Free Choice Act</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/forced-dues">Forced Dues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:34:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3406 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Federal Labor Board to Prosecute Tenet Healthcare for Scheme to Sweep Nurses into Unionization</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/federal-labor-board-prosecute-tenet-healthcare-04032009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/i/newsrelease.png&quot; alt=&quot;News Release&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;457&quot; height=&quot;48&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2009/04/federal-labor-board-prosecute-tenet-04032009&quot; title=&quot;Federal Labor Board to Prosecute Tenet Healthcare for Scheme to Sweep Nurses into Unionization&quot;&gt;Federal Labor Board to Prosecute Tenet Healthcare for Scheme to Sweep Nurses into Unionization&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center; font-style: italic&quot;&gt;Employees seek to throw out union after union bosses’ ugly campaign of harassment and coercion&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Houston, Texas (April 3, 2009)&lt;/b&gt; — National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) prosecutors have filed a complaint this week against Tenet Healthcare Corporation after it entered into a backroom deal with union officials designed to force nurses into union ranks at multiple Houston-area hospitals.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/federal-labor-board-prosecute-tenet-healthcare-04032009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/federal-labor-board-prosecute-tenet-healthcare-04032009#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/california-nurses-association">California Nurses Association</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/national-labor-relations-board">National Labor Relations Board</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/national-right-work-foundation">National Right to Work Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/national-right-work-legal-defense-foundation">National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/tenet">Tenet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:00:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3403 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alarming Trend: Politicians Force Employees Into Union Ranks, Workers Have No Say</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/top-down-union-organizing-drive-01072009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Yesterday&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Politico&lt;/i&gt; featured an article on Big Labor&#039;s agenda for 2009 (which the SEIU union just announced that alone it plans to spend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_11381631&quot;&gt;$85 million&lt;/a&gt; to push for). As we already know, priority one is imposing the card check organizing mandate that leads to intimidation and harassment of workers who may not wish to affiliate with a union.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The whole &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/17080.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; is worth reading, however one particular quote is instructive about the state of Big Labor and union organizing today:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	“For American labor, 2009 will be a big year,” McEntee said. “We have a new administration. We have governors all across the country who are looking toward being able to organize more workers in red states that have become blue.”
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/top-down-union-organizing-drive-01072009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/top-down-union-organizing-drive-01072009#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/afscme">AFSCME</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/blagojevich">Blagojevich</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/card-check">Card Check</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/locke">Locke</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:18:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3313 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Houston Nurses Derail Union Sham Election</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/houston-nurses-derail-union-sham-election-11112308</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In another egregious example of Top Down union organizing, California Nurse Association (CNA) union officials and Tenet Medical Corporation &lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2008/08/nurses-attack-backroom-deal&quot;&gt;attempted to corral unwilling nurses into union ranks by agreeing to forgo federal supervision during unionization elections&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
With free legal assistance from the National Right to Work Foundation, several nurses filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Now we learn that the NLRB has decided to put the sham &amp;quot;elections&amp;quot; on hold pending an official investigation into the charges. Here&#039;s an excerpt from the Foundation&#039;s press release:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/houston-nurses-derail-union-sham-election-11112308&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/houston-nurses-derail-union-sham-election-11112308#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/california-nurses-association">California Nurses Association</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/texas">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:29:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3248 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Foundation Action: Union Bosses, Co-Opted Hospital Scheme to Impose Union</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/foundation-action-union-bosses-co-opted-10082008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
This &lt;a href=&quot;/files/nrtw/sept_oct_08v7_3and8.pdf&quot;&gt;story&lt;/a&gt; from the September/October issue of &lt;a href=&quot;/foundation-action/home.htm&quot;&gt;Foundation &lt;i&gt;Action&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reports on the Foundation&#039;s efforts on behalf of two nurses who are suffering from a corrupt and illegal agreement between the California Nurses Association (CNA) union and their workplace to force nurses into CNA union ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Read the whole story &lt;a href=&quot;/files/nrtw/sept_oct_08v7_3and8.pdf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (pdf) and sign up today for a &lt;a href=&quot;/foundation-action/home.htm&quot;&gt;free print subscription&lt;/a&gt;. To receive the entire issue via email, just type your email address into the box in the top right corner of this page.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/foundation-action-union-bosses-co-opted-10082008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/cna">CNA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/foundation-action">Foundation Action</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/texas">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:58:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3215 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EXPOSED: Naked CNA Union Boss Hypocrisy</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/exposed-cna-union-boss-hypocrisy-08142008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Union boss hypocrisy is nothing new, but &lt;a href=&quot;/press/2008/08/nurses-attack-backroom-deal&quot;&gt;this recent case&lt;/a&gt;, filed by two nurses in Houston, Texas against the CNA union and Tenet Healthcare shows just how blatant that hypocrisy can be.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
When the SEIU bosses got themselves a sweetheart deal to organize nurses from the top down with Catholic Healthcare Partners in Ohio, CNA/NNOC &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/12/us/12union.html?adxnnl=1&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1205337966-K8QfmZ52MfoNW4TAY1V5lA&quot;&gt;denounced&lt;/a&gt; the deal as an illegitimate sell out of workers’ rights to a free and fair election, and workers’ rights to choose or reject unionization with full information, and without coercion or discrimination:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the nurses association, condemned this [SEIU] agreement. She called it “a rigged scam” in which the service employees union would bargain only half-heartedly if it won the vote.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/exposed-cna-union-boss-hypocrisy-08142008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/exposed-cna-union-boss-hypocrisy-08142008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/cna">CNA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/neutrality-agreements">Neutrality Agreements</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/seiu">SEIU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/texas">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:03:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3159 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UAW Officials Negotiating for Forced Dues</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/uaw-officials-negotiating-forced-dues</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;UAW union bosses are currently &lt;a href=&quot;http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070924/UPDATE/709240402&quot;&gt;threatening&lt;/a&gt; to order autoworkers at General Motors plants across the country off the job at 11 am. As per usual when union officials order strikes, expect &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtwc.org/blog/archives/166&quot;&gt;threats and/or violence&lt;/a&gt; against employees who wish to continue working to support their families.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But for all the media attention this strike will receive, one under-reported fact is that high on the list of UAW chief Ron Gettelfinger and the other top union officials’ list of demands is the ability to force nonunion employees into their forced unionism ranks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Youngstown, Ohio &lt;i&gt;Vindicator&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vindy.com/content/local_regional/318115348581118.php&quot;&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; in late August that the ability to forcibly organize nonunion employees is a sticking point in negotiations all around the country:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;	In the current talks, Automotive News reported that UAW officials in Detroit are allowing GM assembly plants in Spring Hill, Tenn., and Lansing, Mich., to negotiate two-tier wage systems. Nonproduction workers would be paid roughly half as much as production workers. 	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;b&gt;In return, the UAW would organize nonunion suppliers&lt;/b&gt; that handle parts sequencing, building maintenance and nonproduction tasks, the trade publication said. 	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	Union sources reported that UAW officials around the country are considering such arrangements. 	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	 [emphasis added] 	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That negotiating demand was echoed again in a September 14th &lt;i&gt;Detroit News&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070914/OPINION01/709140313/1008/opinion01&quot;&gt;editorial&lt;/a&gt; that noted “the UAW is still holding to the position that it must have veto power over plant closings and contracts issued to nonunion suppliers in exchange for the other concessions.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So what do rank-and-file workers think of the fact that union officials are willing to make “concessions” just for the ability to swell their forced dues-paying ranks&#039; Sadly, many are probably unaware of the union officials’ self-serving demands.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if they did know, their reaction might be like the one &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/card-check-bullying&quot;&gt;Mike Ivey&lt;/a&gt; had when he found out that UAW union officials were holding up a promised pay raise in an effort to force him and his coworkers into the UAW union.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/uaw-officials-negotiating-forced-dues&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/uaw-officials-negotiating-forced-dues#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/strikes">Strikes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/top-down-organizing">Top Down Organizing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/uaw">UAW</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:55:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">51 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
