<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>IATSE</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/iatse</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Hollywood Union&#039;s Not-So-Secret Ballot</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/hollywood-unions-not-so-secret-ballot03232009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Now we know why union bosses don&#039;t believe in the secret ballot: they don&#039;t really know what a secret ballot looks like.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Film crew union IATSE recently conducted a vote of its members to ratify its contract proposal with Hollywood producers.  The union bosses sent each member a large packet containing the proposal, a ballot, and two reply envelopes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
After marking the ballot, members were instructed to put the ballot in a white envelope (which does not include any identifying information), and then put the white envelope in a blue envelope (which does include identifying information).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The problem?  The white envelopes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/iatse-hollywood-see-through-ballot-envelopes/&quot;&gt;were see-through&lt;/a&gt;, meaning union bosses could automatically throw out votes opposing the union boss line.  Worse, because the outer envelope contains the voter&#039;s name, union goons would also know which members voted which way.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/hollywood-unions-not-so-secret-ballot03232009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/hollywood-unions-not-so-secret-ballot03232009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:56:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Cote</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3386 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

