<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>National Labor Relations Act</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/national-labor-relations-act</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Worker Advocate Challenges Obama Labor Board Overreach in Federal Court</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/worker-advocate-challenges-nlrb-rule-09192011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/i/newsrelease.png&quot; style=&quot;padding-left: 60px&quot; alt=&quot;News Release&quot; align=&quot;middle&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;48&quot; width=&quot;457&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2011/09/worker-advocate-challenges-nlrb-rule-091620111&quot; title=Worker Advocate Challenges Obama Labor Board Overreach in Federal Court&quot;&gt;Worker Advocate Challenges Obama Labor Board Overreach in Federal Court&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center; font-style: italic&quot;&gt;National Right to Work Foundation attorneys fight Labor Board’s decision to promote monopoly unionism in virtually every workplace in America&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Washington, DC (September 16, 2011)&lt;/b&gt; – Today, National Right to Work Foundation attorneys filed a federal lawsuit challenging the National Labor Relations Board&#039;s (NLRB) new rules governing the notification of employee rights in the workplace.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/worker-advocate-challenges-nlrb-rule-09192011&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/worker-advocate-challenges-nlrb-rule-09192011#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:07:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4017 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Right to Work: A Fundamental Freedom</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-fundamental-freedom-07152011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The following article by National Right to Work Legel Defense Foundation President Mark Mix appeared in the June/July issue of &lt;i&gt;Imprimis&lt;/i&gt;, a publication of Hillsdale College sent each month to 1.9 million subscribers. The article is adapted from a lecture given at Hillsdale College in January 2011.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-fundamental-freedom-07152011&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-fundamental-freedom-07152011#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:13:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3976 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Security Union Officials Hit With Federal Labor Board Charges for Forcing Employees into Union</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/securitas-spfpa-union-charges-11092010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/i/newsrelease.png&quot; style=&quot;padding-left: 60px&quot; alt=&quot;News Release&quot; width=&quot;457&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;48&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2010/11/securitas-spfpa-union-charges-11092010&quot; title=&quot;Security Union Officials Hit With Federal Labor Board Charges for Forcing Employees into Union&quot;&gt;Security Union Officials Hit With Federal Labor Board Charges for Forcing Employees into Union&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center; font-style: italic&quot;&gt;Stealth union organizing campaign springs union boss control over employees without even a vote&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Flint, MI (November 9, 2010)&lt;/b&gt; – A group of eight Securitas Security Services employees filed federal charges against a local union and their employer earlier this week for illegally forcing union monopoly representation and mandatory union fees on the employees without a showing of majority support for the union.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/securitas-spfpa-union-charges-11092010&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/securitas-spfpa-union-charges-11092010#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:38:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3864 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is Obama Planning an Easter Recess Appointment of Radical SEIU Lawyer Craig Becker to the NLRB?</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/obama-planning-easter-craig-becker-03262010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last month, the Senate rejected an attempt to confirm President Barack Obama&#039;s nomination of pro-compulsory unionism radical Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).  The &lt;i&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703312504575141973364708834.html?KEYWORDS=craig+becker&quot;&gt;reports &lt;/a&gt;that with the Senate now taking it&#039;s Easter recess, Becker could be appointed via a recess appointment &amp;quot;as early as today.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As the &lt;i&gt;Journal&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703312504575141973364708834.html?KEYWORDS=craig+becker&quot;&gt;notes&lt;/a&gt;, a Craig Becker NLRB appointment resurrection would be disastrous to employee rights:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/obama-planning-easter-craig-becker-03262010&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/obama-planning-easter-craig-becker-03262010#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:25:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3728 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Big Labor and Big Government May Be the Only Winners in UPS - FedEx War</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/workers-lose-big-labor-and-big-gov-win-in-ups-fedex-war-11102009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
A heated battle &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/10/29/ups-fedex-fire-shots-at-each-other-from-their-trenches-in-new-m/&quot;&gt;is raging&lt;/a&gt; in Congress between major shipping companies United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and FedEx Corporation and the rights of literally tens -- if not hundreds -- of thousands of employees hang in the balance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/workers-lose-big-labor-and-big-gov-win-in-ups-fedex-war-11102009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/workers-lose-big-labor-and-big-gov-win-in-ups-fedex-war-11102009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:53:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3620 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Employees File Federal Class Action Suit to Halt Abusive Mandatory Union Dues Scheme</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/employees-challenge-nationwide-iam-illegal-forced-dues-scheme-09212009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/i/newsrelease.png&quot; alt=&quot;News Release&quot; width=&quot;457&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;48&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2009/09/employees-challenge-nationwide-illegal-forced-dues-scheme-09212009&quot; title=&quot;Employees File Federal Class Action Suit to Halt Abusive Mandatory Union Dues Scheme&quot;&gt;Employees File Federal Class Action Suit to Halt Abusive Mandatory Union Dues Scheme&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center; font-style: italic&quot;&gt;Right to Work Foundation helps employees challenge national union’s illegal “annual objection” policy&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Aberdeen, MD (September 21, 2009)&lt;/b&gt; – Today, two employees filed a class action federal suit challenging the International Association of Machinist and Aerospace Workers (IAM) union’s nationwide policy requiring employees to object year after year to paying union dues they cannot be lawfully forced to pay.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/employees-challenge-nationwide-iam-illegal-forced-dues-scheme-09212009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/employees-challenge-nationwide-iam-illegal-forced-dues-scheme-09212009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:35:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3588 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Coercive Nature of American Labor Law</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/leef-federal-labor-law-anti-liberty-02202009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fff.org/index.htm&quot;&gt;Future of Freedom Foundation&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; &amp;quot;Freedom Daily&amp;quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0810f.asp&quot;&gt;published&lt;/a&gt; an article titled &amp;quot;The Authoritarianism of American Labor Law&amp;quot; by George C. Leef, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Free-Choice-Workers-History-Movement/dp/0915463970&quot;&gt;author&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;i&gt;Free Choice for Workers: A History of the Right to Work Movement&lt;/i&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In it, Leef points out federal labor law, including the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), heavily favors union officials at the expense of workplace freedom and the individual rights of employees.  Leef continues by pointing out the dangers to liberty the &amp;quot;Card Check&amp;quot; Forced Organizing schemes pose to workers&#039; rights:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/leef-federal-labor-law-anti-liberty-02202009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/leef-federal-labor-law-anti-liberty-02202009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:23:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3355 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Quick Hits: 73 Years of Entrenched Federal Forced Unionism Privileges, and the Ugly Reality of Big Labor Racism</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/quick-hits-07072008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
A few Right to Work-related updates from over the holiday weekend:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
1.) July 5th marked the 73rd &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-almanac_7-5-08jul05,0,6197363.story&quot;&gt;anniversary&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Labor_Relations_Act&quot;&gt;National Labor Relations Act&lt;/a&gt;. This legislation, originally enacted in 1935, imposes union officials as middlemen between management and workers. While reformers thought they were curtailing the worst excesses with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taft-Hartley&quot;&gt;Taft-Hartley Amendment&lt;/a&gt;s in 1947, the NLRA continued to give government backing to Big Labor&#039;s monopoly bargaining privileges while actually increasing the government force behind an immoral policy of forcing workers to pay dues for often unwanted union &amp;quot;representation.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/quick-hits-07072008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/quick-hits-07072008#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:31:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3115 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alternatives to Compulsory Unionization?</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/alternatives-compulsory-unionization-06162008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Heritage Foundation has just put up an interesting -- if at times confusing -- new web &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heritage.org/Research/Labor/wm1954.cfm&quot;&gt;memo&lt;/a&gt; on possible alternatives to compulsory unionization. One of the more salient points the author raises is that the legislation governing workplace relations - the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) - is almost entirely obsolete. Times have changed since 1935 (the year the bill was first drafted), and the workplace now emphasizes cooperation over confrontation between management and labor: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	That economy no longer exists. Businesses today rely on feedback and communication from employees. Employers do not simply give top-down orders, but incorporate bottom-up communication and employee discretion. The line between workers and management has increasingly blurred, and most workers want cooperative—not adversarial—relations with their employers. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/alternatives-compulsory-unionization-06162008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/alternatives-compulsory-unionization-06162008#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:07:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3092 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

