<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Postal Workers</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/postal-workers</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Election Fundraising Fraud: Granite State Union Bosses Illegally Divert Worker&#039;s Dues Money to Union PAC</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/worker-slaps-NPMHU-bosses-FEC-dues-laundering-07272009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
When Nashua, New Hampshire postal worker Philip Wakeman paid dues to the National Post Mail Handlers Union (NPMHU), a division of the Laborers&#039; International Union, he had no idea that union bosses would illegally launder his money into their political coffers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In July 2006, Mr. Wakeman gave a check to the NPMHU union for the full amount of his annual union dues. On the &amp;quot;Memo&amp;quot; line at the bottom of the check, he wrote &amp;quot;Union Dues.&amp;quot;  A union official later acknowledged receipt of the dues and everything seemed fine – that is – until he received a bizarre phone call.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/worker-slaps-NPMHU-bosses-FEC-dues-laundering-07272009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/worker-slaps-NPMHU-bosses-FEC-dues-laundering-07272009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:41:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3558 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Annals of Union Corruption, Vol. XXXVIII . . . </title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/annals-union-corruption-vol-xxxviii</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
A recent U.S Court of Appeals &lt;a href=&quot;http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200805/06-7170-1116654.pdf&quot;&gt;ruling&lt;/a&gt; found several National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) union officials guilty of violating the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act. The decision resolved a 1994 suit brought by David Noble, a postal worker who alleged union officials -- including a former NALC president -- funneled workers&#039; dues into  unmonitored expense accounts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Judge Williams&#039; concurrence features some particularly choice tidbits on the NALC&#039;s corrupt practices:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;quot;Placing union money in the officers’ hands, solely on those same officers’ bland assurances that it will be used for union business, completely subverts the [NALC constitution] clause’s obvious goal of preserving accountability.&amp;quot;
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/annals-union-corruption-vol-xxxviii&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/annals-union-corruption-vol-xxxviii#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:12:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3067 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

