<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>police</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/police</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Renegade Lame Duck Congress Votes on Police/Fire Union Bargaining Mandate</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/renegade-lame-duck-congress-votes-police-fire-bill-12082010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Today, Mark Mix, President of National Right to Work &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/dec/7/lame-ducks-paying-their-unions-dues/?page=1&quot;&gt;was published&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;i&gt;Washington Times&lt;/i&gt; regarding today&#039;s U.S. Senate vote on Senator Harry Reid&#039;s Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill (S. 3991).  Despite voters sending a clear message to Washington last month, it appears some pro-forced unionism senators didn&#039;t quite get the message:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	If Mr. Reid cared one whit for what ordinary Americans think, he would respond to such electoral drubbings for his fellow Big Labor Democrats and GOP fellow travelers by backing away from federally mandated union-boss control over public-safety officers. Instead, he announced over the weekend that he will file for cloture and force a vote on this draconian bill on Wednesday. Among those voting will be 14 defeated or retiring senators who won&#039;t be back in January.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/renegade-lame-duck-congress-votes-police-fire-bill-12082010&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/renegade-lame-duck-congress-votes-police-fire-bill-12082010#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:22:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3869 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Big Labor Exploits Another Terror Attack to Expand Compulsory Unionism</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/big-labor-apologists-exploit-terror-attack-12302009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/union-bigwigs-seize-holiday-tragedy-12032008&quot;&gt;True&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/en/strike-against-lockheed-martin-underscores-big-labor-s-historical-exploitation-national-crises&quot;&gt;form&lt;/a&gt;, compulsory unionism advocates are exploiting a serious situation to try to force more workers into union monopoly control. In this case, union bosses &lt;a href=&quot;/en/federal-labor-board-urged-not-jeopardize-national-security-imposing-unionization-airport-screeners&quot;&gt;have long set their sights&lt;/a&gt; on forcing America&#039;s airport screeners into union ranks. From the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703510304574626271709490960.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_opinion&quot;&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/big-labor-apologists-exploit-terror-attack-12302009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/big-labor-apologists-exploit-terror-attack-12302009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:31:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3668 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Top 10 Forced Unionism Power Grabs on Big Labor&#039;s Agenda</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/top-10-things-big-labors-agenda-12102008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=29844#c1&quot;&gt;this week&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; &amp;quot;Top 10 List&amp;quot; from &lt;i&gt;Human Events&lt;/i&gt;, the staff of &lt;i&gt;Human Events&lt;/i&gt; listed the &amp;quot;Top 10 Things On Big Labor&#039;s Agenda.&amp;quot;  The list is telling, as it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=29844#c1&quot;&gt;describes&lt;/a&gt; Big Labor&#039;s outrageous plans to to grab more coercive power and erode employees&#039; rights in the workplace.  Of course, the so-called &amp;quot;Employee Free Choice Act&amp;quot;, more accurately called the &amp;quot;Card Check&amp;quot; Forced Unionism Bill tops the list:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;b&gt;1. Employee Free Choice Act&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	In addition to the notorious “card-check” provision that strips union members of their right to a secret ballot, this bill also provides for increased penalties for employers who commit allegedly unfair labor practices...
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/top-10-things-big-labors-agenda-12102008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/top-10-things-big-labors-agenda-12102008#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:54:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3281 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Goal of Federally Imposed Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining is More Forced Union Dues</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/police-and-firefighter-monopoly-08042008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
This month&#039;s issue of the Capital Research Center&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Labor Watch&lt;/i&gt; newsletter features a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pubs.html?id=652&quot;&gt;cover story&lt;/a&gt; on Big Labor&#039;s attempts to force public safety officers nationwide into monopoly union collectives. The article details many unjust aspects of federal monopoly bargaining power grab, not the least of which is that it trumps state laws while stripping employees of their right to negotiate their own terms of employment or be rewarded for their individual merits.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While the National Right to Work Committee continues to lead the fight against the bill&#039;s passage, Foundation attorneys are preparing for a legal challenge if it becomes law.  We have previously reported on this overall situation &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/why-monopoly-bargaining-violation-employees-individual-rights&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One passage in the Labor Watch piece is particularly noteworthy:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/police-and-firefighter-monopoly-08042008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/police-and-firefighter-monopoly-08042008#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:16:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3149 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wall Street Journal Exposes Union Power Grab Over America&#039;s First Responders</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/why-monopoly-bargaining-violation-employees-individual-rights</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;i&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/i&gt; has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121055247300183929.html&quot;&gt;editorial&lt;/a&gt; today opposing the federal imposition of monopoly bargaining on America&#039;s firefighters, police, and EMTs.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The article lists many compelling reasons to be against monopoly bargaining, but never fully lays out the case for opposition to this form of compulsory unionism as a fundamental issue of employees&#039; individual rights.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The fact is freedom of association should preclude union bosses from being able to force employees to accept their so-called &amp;quot;representation,&amp;quot; thereby stripping individuals of their freedom to contract.  Even worse, union bosses force employees -- union members or not -- to pay money for the &amp;quot;privilege&amp;quot; of losing their right of self-representation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/why-monopoly-bargaining-violation-employees-individual-rights&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/why-monopoly-bargaining-violation-employees-individual-rights#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:44:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3061 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

