<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Ninth Circuit</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/ninth-circuit</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Right to Work Win Forbids Union Bosses from Using Another Enron-Like Accounting Trick to Jack Up Forced Dues</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-win-federal-court-stops-union-bosses-05192008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;i&gt;Daily Labor Report&lt;/i&gt; (subscription only) recently reported on an important win for National Right to Work Foundation staff attorneys in the 9th Circuit Federal Appeals Court:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;i&gt;Upholding the National Labor Relations Board&#039;s January 2006 decision against Studio Transportation Drivers Local 399 of the Teamsters, the appeals court found that the union, which used the arbitration awards for nonrepresentational purposes such as political and charitable contributions, should exclude the money from its calculation of agency fees rather than use it to reduce its reported nonrepresentational expenses.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;/i&gt;
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;i&gt;By spending the arbitration award money on nonrepresentational rather than representational expenditures, the union in effect increased the agency fees owed by the objecting nonmember for representational expenses, Judge Harry Pregerson wrote for the appeals court.&lt;/i&gt;
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-win-federal-court-stops-union-bosses-05192008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-win-federal-court-stops-union-bosses-05192008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/california">California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/forced-dues">Forced Dues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/ninth-circuit">Ninth Circuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/right-work-states">Right to Work States</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/teamsters">Teamsters</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:44:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3068 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>U.S. Supreme Court Reviews Ruling Endorsing Coercive Union Organizing Today</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/u-s-supreme-court-reviews-ruling-endorsing-coercive-union-organizing-today</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
Oral arguments take place this morning at the U.S. Supreme Court in a key case in which the Ninth Circuit reversed two of its earlier rulings and found that employers that receive state funds can be forced to implement coercive union organizing, including &amp;quot;card check&amp;quot; drives. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
When the Supreme Court took up the case in November, National Right to Work Foundation Vice President Stefan Gleason had this to say: &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
“&lt;st1:state&gt;&lt;st1:place&gt;California&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:state&gt; officials are using the heavy hand of government to trample upon workers’ rights. Because union hierarchies seem to be having difficulties persuading employees to join unions voluntarily, they have resorted to coercive tactics in&lt;br /&gt;
order to maintain the flow of forced union dues.&amp;quot; &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/u-s-supreme-court-reviews-ruling-endorsing-coercive-union-organizing-today&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/u-s-supreme-court-reviews-ruling-endorsing-coercive-union-organizing-today#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/california">California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/card-check">Card Check</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/neutrality-agreements">Neutrality Agreements</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/ninth-circuit">Ninth Circuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/pre-emption">Pre-emption</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/u-s-supreme-court">U.S. Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:57:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin Hakes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3020 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
