<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Neutrality Agreements</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/neutrality-agreements</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Worker Speaks Out Against Obama Labor Board Before Congress</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/congressional-hearing-ivey-dana-09232011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In the wake of National Labor Relations Board&#039;s (NLRB) move to kill the only protection workers have against card check forced unionism, the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=260180&quot;&gt;held a hearing yesterday&lt;/a&gt; about the recent onslaught of the NLRB&#039;s pro-forced unionism rulings as former-Chairwoman Wilma Liebman&#039;s term expired late last month.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Testifying at the hearing was Barbara Ivey, who works at a Portland, Oregon-based IT unit at Kaiser Permanente.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Ivey and 60 of her coworkers were subjected to a Service Employees International Union (SEIU) &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/new-right-work-video-truth-about-card-check-06172009&quot;&gt;card check&lt;/a&gt; forced unionization campaign (via a &lt;a href=&quot;/en/neutrality&quot;&gt;neutrality agreement&lt;/a&gt;).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/congressional-hearing-ivey-dana-09232011&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/congressional-hearing-ivey-dana-09232011#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:18:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4019 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Kansas City Nurse Challenges Backroom Union Deal to Silence Employees Who Oppose Unionization</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/kansas-city-nurse-challenges-backroom-deal-08122010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/i/newsrelease.png&quot; style=&quot;padding-left: 60px&quot; alt=&quot;News Release&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;457&quot; height=&quot;48&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2010/08/kansas-city-nurse-challenges-backroom-deal-08122010&quot; title=&quot;Kansas City Nurse Challenges Backroom Union Deal to Silence Employees Who Oppose Unionization&quot;&gt;Kansas City Nurse Challenges Backroom Union Deal to Silence Employees Who Oppose Unionization&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center; font-style: italic&quot;&gt;Research Medical Center nurse files federal unfair labor practice charges against secret “neutrality agreement” that gives union organizers preferential treatment&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/kansas-city-nurse-challenges-backroom-deal-08122010&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/kansas-city-nurse-challenges-backroom-deal-08122010#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:11:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3823 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Employee Hits AT&amp;T/Union Officials with Federal Labor Charges Attacking Scheme to Unionize Workers</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/employee-hits-att-union-officials-federal-labor-charges-02242010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/i/newsrelease.png&quot; style=&quot;padding-left: 60px&quot; alt=&quot;News Release&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;457&quot; height=&quot;48&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2010/02/att-employee-hits-CWA-union-officials-federal-charges-02242010&quot; title=&quot;Employee Hits AT&amp;amp;T/Union Officials with Federal Labor Charges Attacking Scheme to Unionize Workers&quot;&gt;Employee Hits AT&amp;amp;T/Union Officials with Federal Labor Charges Attacking Scheme to Unionize Workers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center; font-style: italic&quot;&gt;Fearing lack of support, communications union bosses are attempting to rig election employees initiated to throw out unwanted union&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Seattle, WA (February 24, 2010)&lt;/b&gt; – With free legal aid from the National Right to Work Foundation, a Redmond-based AT&amp;amp;T Mobility employee filed federal charges after union organizers illegally colluded with company officials to sweep AT&amp;amp;T workers across the state into union ranks in exchange for contract concessions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/employee-hits-att-union-officials-federal-labor-charges-02242010&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/employee-hits-att-union-officials-federal-labor-charges-02242010#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:04:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3706 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Workers Prevail in Battle for Secret Ballot Vote After Corrupt Card Check Unionization Scheme</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/workers-prevail-in-battle-for-secret-ballot-vote-02112010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/i/newsrelease.png&quot; style=&quot;padding-left: 60px&quot; alt=&quot;News Release&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;457&quot; height=&quot;48&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/en/press/2010/02/workers-prevail-in-battle-for-secret-ballot-02112010&quot; title=&quot;Workers Prevail in Battle for Secret Ballot Vote After Corrupt Card Check Unionization Scheme&quot;&gt;Workers Prevail in Battle for Secret Ballot Vote After Corrupt Card Check Unionization Scheme&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 style=&quot;text-align: center; font-style: italic&quot;&gt;Communications union bosses collude with AT&amp;amp;T to lock local group into union ranks without majority support&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Seattle, WA (February 11, 2010)&lt;/b&gt; – A group of AT&amp;amp;T Mobility employees have won a legal victory countering union officials’ domination of their workplace using a coercive card check unionization campaign that occurred after union organizers colluded with AT&amp;amp;T officials to sweep the workers into union ranks in exchange for contract concessions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/workers-prevail-in-battle-for-secret-ballot-vote-02112010&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/workers-prevail-in-battle-for-secret-ballot-vote-02112010#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:35:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3698 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Appellate Court Errs by Blocking an Examination into UAW Backroom Deal as a Form of Labor Bribery</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/appellate-court-errs-12292008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;National Right to Work Foundation Vice President Stefan Gleason made the following statement after the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld union lawyers&#039; motion to dismiss of the case challenging a corrupt quid-pro-quo organizing agreement reached by Freightliner and UAW union officials in North and South Carolina: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
	Regrettably, the court severely misread and misinterpreted the statute.  &amp;quot;Things of value&amp;quot; as defined under numerous federal statutes have long been held by courts to include intangible or non-monetary benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/appellate-court-errs-12292008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/appellate-court-errs-12292008#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:06:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3302 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Worker Seeks Injunction to Prevent Unwanted Union from Acquiring Confidential Personal Information</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/worker-seeks-injunction-prevent-unwanted-unio11062008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This week, National Right to Work Foundation attorneys filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida challenging the &lt;i&gt;quid pro quo&lt;/i&gt; between Mardi Gras Gaming and UNITE HERE Local 355 union bosses:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Boca Raton, Florida (November 6, 2008)&lt;/b&gt; – With free legal assistance from the National Right to Work Foundation, an employee at a Mardi Gras Gaming facility has filed a federal lawsuit to prevent UNITE HERE Local 355 union officials from obtaining illegal assistance in pressuring workers to unionize – including possession of workers’ personal addresses and other private information. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/worker-seeks-injunction-prevent-unwanted-unio11062008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/worker-seeks-injunction-prevent-unwanted-unio11062008#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:26:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Cote</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3243 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EXPOSED: Naked CNA Union Boss Hypocrisy</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/exposed-cna-union-boss-hypocrisy-08142008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Union boss hypocrisy is nothing new, but &lt;a href=&quot;/press/2008/08/nurses-attack-backroom-deal&quot;&gt;this recent case&lt;/a&gt;, filed by two nurses in Houston, Texas against the CNA union and Tenet Healthcare shows just how blatant that hypocrisy can be.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
When the SEIU bosses got themselves a sweetheart deal to organize nurses from the top down with Catholic Healthcare Partners in Ohio, CNA/NNOC &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/12/us/12union.html?adxnnl=1&amp;amp;adxnnlx=1205337966-K8QfmZ52MfoNW4TAY1V5lA&quot;&gt;denounced&lt;/a&gt; the deal as an illegitimate sell out of workers’ rights to a free and fair election, and workers’ rights to choose or reject unionization with full information, and without coercion or discrimination:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the nurses association, condemned this [SEIU] agreement. She called it “a rigged scam” in which the service employees union would bargain only half-heartedly if it won the vote.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/exposed-cna-union-boss-hypocrisy-08142008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/exposed-cna-union-boss-hypocrisy-08142008#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:03:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3159 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Chicago Tribune: Members Question Backroom Union Deals</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/chicago-tribune-members-question-backroom-union-deal-05202008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
This weekend the &lt;i&gt;Chicago Tribune&lt;/i&gt; featured a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-sun-labor-secret-contracts-may18,0,639669.story&quot;&gt;story&lt;/a&gt; about secret deals that union officials are cutting with certain targeted employers to corral employees into the union&#039;s ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In exchange for the company&#039;s assistance in unionizing employees (almost always by green-lighting a coercive card check drive and often by actively promoting the chosen union), union officials promise all sorts of things -- ranging from promises not to badmouth the company anymore, to agreeing to drop demands for higher wages and health care benefits, to concessions in other bargaining units.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Not surprisingly, union bosses do their best to hide these agreements from the very employees they seek to represent, and even a few union officials are critical of the deals.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/chicago-tribune-members-question-backroom-union-deal-05202008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/chicago-tribune-members-question-backroom-union-deal-05202008#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:49:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3069 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No Questions Please. Just Sign the Card</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/no-questions-please-just-sign-card</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Here&#039;s an interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/may/05/mischief-making-blockers-are-signature-gatherers-b/&quot;&gt;story&lt;/a&gt; (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eiaonline.com/communique.htm&quot;&gt;EIA&lt;/a&gt;) from Nevada where teacher union officials are gathering signatures to put a massive tax increase on the ballot in November.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to the &lt;i&gt;Las Vegas Sun&lt;/i&gt;, union political operatives, who need to collect tens of thousands of signatures in order to put the tax hike on the ballot, are having trouble getting people to sign because &amp;quot;blockers&amp;quot; who oppose the tax increase are voicing their opposition to prospective signers during the collection process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/no-questions-please-just-sign-card&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/no-questions-please-just-sign-card#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:38:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick Semmens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3059 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>U.S. Supreme Court Reviews Ruling Endorsing Coercive Union Organizing Today</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/u-s-supreme-court-reviews-ruling-endorsing-coercive-union-organizing-today</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
Oral arguments take place this morning at the U.S. Supreme Court in a key case in which the Ninth Circuit reversed two of its earlier rulings and found that employers that receive state funds can be forced to implement coercive union organizing, including &amp;quot;card check&amp;quot; drives. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
When the Supreme Court took up the case in November, National Right to Work Foundation Vice President Stefan Gleason had this to say: &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
“&lt;st1:state&gt;&lt;st1:place&gt;California&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:state&gt; officials are using the heavy hand of government to trample upon workers’ rights. Because union hierarchies seem to be having difficulties persuading employees to join unions voluntarily, they have resorted to coercive tactics in&lt;br /&gt;
order to maintain the flow of forced union dues.&amp;quot; &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/u-s-supreme-court-reviews-ruling-endorsing-coercive-union-organizing-today&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/u-s-supreme-court-reviews-ruling-endorsing-coercive-union-organizing-today#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:57:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin Hakes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3020 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

