<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Pre-emption</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/pre-emption</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>U.S. Supreme Court Reviews Ruling Endorsing Coercive Union Organizing Today</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/u-s-supreme-court-reviews-ruling-endorsing-coercive-union-organizing-today</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
Oral arguments take place this morning at the U.S. Supreme Court in a key case in which the Ninth Circuit reversed two of its earlier rulings and found that employers that receive state funds can be forced to implement coercive union organizing, including &amp;quot;card check&amp;quot; drives. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
When the Supreme Court took up the case in November, National Right to Work Foundation Vice President Stefan Gleason had this to say: &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
“&lt;st1:state&gt;&lt;st1:place&gt;California&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:state&gt; officials are using the heavy hand of government to trample upon workers’ rights. Because union hierarchies seem to be having difficulties persuading employees to join unions voluntarily, they have resorted to coercive tactics in&lt;br /&gt;
order to maintain the flow of forced union dues.&amp;quot; &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/u-s-supreme-court-reviews-ruling-endorsing-coercive-union-organizing-today&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/u-s-supreme-court-reviews-ruling-endorsing-coercive-union-organizing-today#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:57:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin Hakes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3020 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Right to Work Again Advances Arguments @ U.S. Supreme Court</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-again-advances-arguments-u-s-supreme-court</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The National Right to Work Foundation just filed a &amp;quot;friend of the court&amp;quot; &lt;a href=&quot;/files/nrtw/06-939tsacNationalRightToWork.pdf&quot;&gt;brief&lt;/a&gt; supporting employee free choice at the U.S. Supreme Court in the &lt;a href=&quot;/b/nr_718.php&quot;&gt;Chamber v. Brown&lt;/a&gt; case.  At issue is a controversial 9th Circuit decision that basically forces coercive union organizing on private companies receiving state funds.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Foundation attorneys have successfully helped contest similiar laws in &lt;a href=&quot;/b/nr_455.php&quot;&gt;Wisconsin&lt;/a&gt;, and through this &lt;a href=&quot;/neutrality/PatakiAmicus.pdf&quot;&gt;brief&lt;/a&gt; in New York.  Additionally, with &lt;a href=&quot;/foundation-won.htm&quot;&gt;13 trips&lt;/a&gt; to the U.S. Supreme Court on record, most recently the 2007 &lt;a href=&quot;/b/nr_648.php&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Davenport&lt;/i&gt; defensive victory&lt;/a&gt;, Foundation attorneys are no strangers to the highest court in the land.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-again-advances-arguments-u-s-supreme-court#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:37:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin Hakes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1168 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

