<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nrtw.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NILRR</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/free-tagging/nilrr</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>New Fact Sheet Confirms: Right to Work States Benefit from Faster Growth, Better Pay</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/new-fact-sheet-shows-right-work-states-benefi-10262011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Regular &lt;i&gt;Freedom@Work&lt;/i&gt; readers are already familiar with &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/right-work-good-business-good-for-workers-09202011&quot;&gt;a growing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/new-study-shows-right-work-states-enjoy-highe-11152010&quot;&gt;body&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/survey-says-right-work-policies-encourage-07112008&quot;&gt;of evidence&lt;/a&gt; that points to Right to Work states&#039; superior economic performance. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/files/NILRR%20FACT%20SHEET%20RTW%20States%20Benefit%202011.pdf&quot;&gt;A new fact sheet&lt;/a&gt; from the National Institute for Labor Relations Research further bolsters the economic case for worker freedom. The Institute&#039;s findings show that citizens in Right to Work states enjoyed faster growth and more purchasing power than their counterparts in forced unionism states over the past 10 years. Here are a few of the highlights:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;b&gt;Right to Work States Benefit From Faster Growth, Higher Real Purchasing Power – 2011 Update&lt;/b&gt;
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/new-fact-sheet-shows-right-work-states-benefi-10262011&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/new-fact-sheet-shows-right-work-states-benefi-10262011#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:29:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4029 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Right to Work: Good for Business, Good for Jobs, and Good for Workers</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-good-business-good-for-workers-09202011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
As &lt;a href=&quot;http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/survey-right-work-states-best-business&quot;&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;i&gt;Washington Examiner&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s &amp;quot;Beltway Confidential&amp;quot; blog, Development Counselors International (DCI) recently asked corporate executives and representatives which states they thought were the best to locate for business.  As the &lt;i&gt;Examiner&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/survey-right-work-states-best-business&quot;&gt;notes&lt;/a&gt;, America&#039;s job providers overwhelmingly favored states with Right to Work laws.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of course this should come to no surprise.  The results of DCI&#039;s survey &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/surprise-suprise-right-work-states-top-cnbc-b-07152010&quot;&gt;largely mirrors&lt;/a&gt; that of CNBC 2010 &amp;quot;Best for Business&amp;quot; list, in which states with Right to Work protections for its workers were ranked seven of the top 10 and 10 of the top 15.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-good-business-good-for-workers-09202011&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/right-work-good-business-good-for-workers-09202011#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:22:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4018 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Legacy of Big Labor Violence: A Growing Problem</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/legacy-big-labor-violence-growing-problem-08182011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
As &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/union-militancy-and-verizon-strike08122111&quot;&gt;previously reported&lt;/a&gt; on the Freedom@Work blog, union militants are certainly making headlines of late using violent tactics and vandalism to prove their point.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Stunningly, union thugs in Michigan may have taken this to the next level last week when John King, owner of King Electrical Services, was reportedly shot by a union goon spraying the word &amp;quot;scab&amp;quot; on the side of his car in the driveway.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of course this should surprise no one familiar with the violent legacy of Big Labor, including that of AFL-CIO union boss &lt;a href=&quot;/en/blog/richard-trumka-facts-09152609&quot;&gt;Richard Trumka&lt;/a&gt;.  But for good measure, the Investor&#039;s Business Daily (IBD) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=581864&amp;amp;p=1&quot;&gt;opined today&lt;/a&gt; about union bosses&#039; reliance on violence to get their way:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/legacy-big-labor-violence-growing-problem-08182011&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/legacy-big-labor-violence-growing-problem-08182011#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:58:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3997 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Report: Working Families Fleeing Forced-Unionism States to Find Workplace Freedom and Economic Prosperity</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/workers-flee-forced-unionism-11232009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org&quot;&gt;National Institute for Labor Relations Research&lt;/a&gt; (NILRR) has just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/node/98&quot;&gt;released&lt;/a&gt; a report entitled &amp;quot;Tax-Paying Families Are Fleeing Forced-Unionism States&amp;quot; that details how and why families are moving from the 28 states that do not protect employees from forced unionism to the 22 states that do:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The IRS’s Statistical Information Service (SIS)... data for the Tax Filing Year 2008 show that a total of 1.523 million personal income tax filers were residing that year in a Right to Work state after residing somewhere else in the 50 states or the District of Columbia the previous year.  Meanwhile, a total of 1.338 million tax filers were residing in a Right to Work state in 2007, but filed from one of the other 49 states or the District of Columbia in&lt;br /&gt;
	2008.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/workers-flee-forced-unionism-11232009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/workers-flee-forced-unionism-11232009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:09:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3636 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fact Sheet: Families Benefit from Right to Work Laws</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/families-benefit-from-right-work-laws-10232009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The National Institute for Labor Relations Research (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/&quot;&gt;NILRR&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/node/97&quot;&gt;has released&lt;/a&gt; a telling study comparing Right to Work states with forced-unionism states in a variety of statistical categories.  The statistics, provided by various governmental departments and agencies as well as respected non-profits, show the stunning economic and personal benefits families enjoy from their states&#039; popular Right to Work laws.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The last five years of available data shows that workers in Right to Work states not only enjoy higher non-farm private-sector job growth (9.1% versus 3.6% from 2003-2008), but their real personal incomes are also growing faster (15.8% vs. 9.1% from 2003-2008) and they enjoy a higher disposable income ($34,878 vs. $32,811 in 2008) than their counterparts in forced unionism states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/families-benefit-from-right-work-laws-10232009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/families-benefit-from-right-work-laws-10232009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:37:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3605 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fact Sheet: States with High Rate of Union Monopoly Bargaining Suffering a Horrific &quot;Lost Decade&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/union-boss-monopoly-bargaining-hinders-job-growth-09282409</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last week, the pro-worker think tank &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/&quot;&gt;National Institute for Labor Relations Research&lt;/a&gt; (NILRR) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/node/96&quot;&gt;released&lt;/a&gt; a Fact Sheet entitled “Negative Employment Growth Since November 2001” that details how highly-unionized states are suffering a &amp;quot;lost decade&amp;quot; in terms of private-sector job growth, while the least-unionized states have benefited from a nearly 1.5 million private-sector job growth:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	As of 2001, the year of the last national recession prior to the current one, 9.7% of private-sector employees nationwide were under “exclusive” union representation.  But in 16 states – Alaska, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania,. Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin – 11.0% or more of private-sector workers were unionized.
	&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/union-boss-monopoly-bargaining-hinders-job-growth-09282409&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/union-boss-monopoly-bargaining-hinders-job-growth-09282409#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:36:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3593 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fact Sheet: Union Monopoly Privileges Linked to Lower Earnings and Disposable Incomes for Workers</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/nilrr-union-monopoly-linked-lower-purchasing-power-08282009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Contrary to the usual propaganda union bosses would like you to believe, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/&quot;&gt;National Institute for Labor Relations Research&lt;/a&gt; (NILRR) -- an anti-compulsory unionism think tank that exposes the harm forced unionism inflicts on workers -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/node/95&quot;&gt;released&lt;/a&gt; a report today entitled &amp;quot;Union Monopoly Linked to Lower Purchasing Power&amp;quot; that details how workers in least-unionized states enjoy the benefits of higher cost-of-living-adjusted earnings and disposable incomes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You see, not only does government-granted union monopoly bargaining privileges infringe on employees&#039; individual liberty, it also harms employees&#039; economic interests.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to NILRR:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/nilrr-union-monopoly-linked-lower-purchasing-power-08282009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/nilrr-union-monopoly-linked-lower-purchasing-power-08282009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:12:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3571 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pro-Worker Think Tank: Big Labor Pushing Dangerous Public Safety Monopoly Bargaining Mandate</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/NILRR-police-and-firefighter-monopoly-bargaining-bill-07222809</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/&quot;&gt;National Institute for Labor Relations Research&lt;/a&gt; (NILRR) has just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/node/93&quot;&gt;published&lt;/a&gt; an eye-opening fact sheet revealing the dangers of Big Labor&#039;s latest push to use the U.S. Congress &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/White-House-gives-public-safety-unions-clout-to-intimidate-7927903-49981732.html&quot;&gt;to impose&lt;/a&gt; union monopoly bargaining and forced dues on public safety workers in cash-strapped states and localities.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/NILRR-police-and-firefighter-monopoly-bargaining-bill-07222809&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/NILRR-police-and-firefighter-monopoly-bargaining-bill-07222809#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:12:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3550 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Compulsory Unionism Bankrupting States: Workers Flee to Right to Work States for Jobs</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/big-labors-bankrupting-agenda-07012009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
As the current economic downturn continues, many states across the nation are starting to find it increasingly difficult to stay afloat after having capitulated to the union bosses&#039; extortionate demands.   Last week, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124597150183556945.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; cited the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/&quot;&gt;National Institute for Labor Relations Research&lt;/a&gt; (NILRR) -- an anti-compulsory unionism think tank that exposes the harm forced unionism inflicts on workers -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124597150183556945.html&quot;&gt;when discussing&lt;/a&gt; Big Labor&#039;s contribution toward the severe financial difficulties California, New York, and New Jersey are experiencing and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/node/88&quot;&gt;migration&lt;/a&gt; of workers leaving these forced-unionism states:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/big-labors-bankrupting-agenda-07012009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/big-labors-bankrupting-agenda-07012009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:15:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3539 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Research Institute Finds ‘Card-Check’ Forced Unionism Threatens Job-Based Private Health Insurance</title>
 <link>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/card-check-threatens-job-based-private-health-insurance-06042009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/&quot;&gt;National Institute for Labor Relations Research&lt;/a&gt; (NILRR) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nilrr.org/files/Card%20Checks%20Threaten%20Job-Based%20Health%20Insurance.pdf&quot;&gt;recently published&lt;/a&gt; a fact sheet discussing U.S. Census Bureau data from 1999 to 2007 that shows the &amp;quot;Card Check&amp;quot; Forced Unionism Bill and similar legislative &amp;quot;compromises&amp;quot; actually endanger workers&#039; access to health insurance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/files/nrtw/stethoscope.jpg&quot; vspace=&quot;4&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;8&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to NILRR&#039;s observations:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/card-check-threatens-job-based-private-health-insurance-06042009&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/card-check-threatens-job-based-private-health-insurance-06042009#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:22:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Riedel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3524 at http://www.nrtw.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

