Nurse Hits Union Brass with Unfair Labor Practice Charges for Illegal Forced Dues Scheme
Nurses campaigning to strip union officials of their power to get nurses fired for refusing to pay union dues
Warwick, RI (September 23, 2009) – With free legal aid from the National Right to Work Foundation, a Kent Hospital nurse has filed federal unfair labor practice charges against a local nursing union for illegally attempting to coerce her and other employees into formal, full-dues paying membership.
The charges come just as the nurses are seeking an election to strip the United Nurses and Allied Professionals (UNAP) Local 5008 union hierarchy of all power to compel dues payments as a job condition.
In the 22 states with Right to Work protections, employees cannot be forced to pay any union dues. The U.S. Supreme Court held in the Foundation-won Communication Workers of America v. Beck (1988) that union officials in states like Rhode Island, which do not have Right to Work laws, can lawfully compel nonmembers to pay union dues as a job condition, but not the part of dues spent for activities like political activism, lobbying, and member-only events. Union officials must also provide nonmembers with an independently audited breakdown of union expenditures, and nonmembers may challenge the calculation of the reduced fees.
Local 5008 recently disseminated a “Fact Sheet on Union Dues” to Jeanette Geary and other nurses at Kent Hospital. In the document, union officials told the employees that if they wish to exercise their right to refrain from union membership, they will pay only one dollar less per pay period than union members. But union officials never provided the nurses with the required independent audit of union expenditures necessary to determine whether they are being forced to pay more than allowed under law.
Foundation attorneys argue that Local 5008 union bosses have also implemented an illegal policy designed to force employees into “choosing” automatic deduction of monthly dues over the burdensome alternative of two lump sums paid semi-annually. Union officials have also informed the nurses that dues will be deducted automatically, even if they never authorized the deduction.
The National Labor Relations Board regional director in Boston will now investigate the charges and determine whether to prosecute Local 5008 before an administrative law judge. Geary is also spearheading a campaign to collect signatures from her fellow nurses to conduct a deauthorization election, which would remove the forced-dues clause from the contract.
“Sadly, skirting financial disclosure requirements and trying to coerce nurses like Jeanette Geary into union membership has become standard operating procedure for these union officials,” said Stefan Gleason, vice president of the National Right to Work Foundation.
Comments
Prosecute UNAP
What a great way to start the weekend. Seeing UNAP finally being viewed for what they really are (crooks) is so uplifting. Great job Kent Nurses. Keep the pressure on them. They have done nothing to help any of us except take our money in time of recession. Enough is enough. Take 'em down.
unionization
I so much appreciate the ones in their union that is starting to "make noise"! I have been waiting for this for sooo long. I always believed in fairness and compassion, that is just an Anerican trait! I never believed in something for nothing - somebody always pays for it!. Thank God for people like you, please keep it up, and we will win our country back from these "behind the scenes puppet masters"!
UNAP - it needs to go!
I am a Kent Nurse and I am anti-UNAP. Where else in America would people legally be forced to join something? Where else could you be fired for simply speaking out against abusive practices but in a non-RTW state? I am a liberal but I have never ben pro-union. If I feel a union is not doing the right thing, it should not only be my right but my DUTY to speak up. There are whistle-blower laws that protect employees who speak out against their companies and we should have the same protection in every state against unions such as UNAP. They have not done one thing to show me that I am wrong in my anti-union stance but they've done many things that reinforce my beliefs.
liberalism - your liberalism!
I agree with you that NO ONE should be forced to join an organization whose charter they do not agree with! However, speaking as a conservative (believe it or not!)you as a liberal would have t define your liberalism to me before I believe you are a liberal! A libertarian...ok, but a liberal???? A liberal in my estimation is all abut big government, big unions, big control etc. I was a union member at one time before I was able to get out of it by becoming a "company man", so to speak. That meant working long hours with little pay and recognition, yet loving the freedom and opportunity I had. I frankly do not think you are a liberal! I think you are an opportunist, like we ALL want to be with the right to pursue our future as WE see fit.
By the way, thank you for being an American, regardless of what you call yourself.