Blacklisting Rule: Obama Makes First Major Payback to Big Labor
Labor Secretary handed sweeping new power to blacklist union targets, while workers remain in the dark about right to refrain from union membership
Washington, DC (January 30, 2009) – President Barack Obama issued two decrees today intended to corral millions more American workers into forced unionism while blacklisting non-union employees from working on taxpayer funded projects.
“After spending more than a billion dollars in forced union dues to get Obama elected, the union bosses have received their first major payoff – two executive orders intended to grease the rails for coercive union organizing, give the Secretary of Labor the power to blacklist union-targeted employers and employees, and keep workers in the dark about their rights to refrain from union membership,” said Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. “Obama’s two executive orders serve one basic goal: to seize more forced dues revenue to fund Big Labor’s political agenda.”
Obama repealed Executive Order 13201 signed by President George W. Bush which had helped ensure that employees of federal contractors were informed of their rights under the U.S. Supreme Court case Communication Workers v. Beck (1988). Won by attorneys at the National Right to Work Foundation, Beck held that private-sector employees may be compelled to pay certain union dues, but may not be compelled to pay any dues or fees earmarked for union politics, lobbying, and other non-bargaining activities.
President Obama included the revocation of Beck rights notices in an executive order advertising, and essentially endorsing, the formation of unions under a theory (long discredited by academic research) that forcing employees into union collectives will somehow prevent “substantial obstructions to the free flow of commerce.”
The executive order also purports to give the Secretary of Labor the authority to determine what will be required by the notice, the authority to investigate violations, to hold hearings, and the power to punish violators of all federal labor laws mentioned in the notice. In effect, the Secretary of Labor would become an additional judge, jury, and executioner of federal labor laws with respect to federal contractors. Most importantly, the Secretary would determine whether a contractor would be fired by the federal government (apparently where the contractor has not even been found to have violated any laws by the law enforcement body of jurisdiction). Even President Bill Clinton stopped short of attempting to give the Secretary of Labor a "blacklisting" power, which is almost certainly unlawful.
Another new order effectively bars federal contractors from communicating truthful information about unionization to their employees.
“It’s disgusting to see this blatant payoff to Big Labor only two weeks into Obama’s term,” continued Mix. “Today, President Obama has sent an ominous message to the 93 percent of private sector workers in America who, for whatever reasons, have chosen not to unionize: You’re not welcome here.”
--
Comments
Finally
I’ve been using a slight variation found inside UGGs Outlet the Hybrid theme for this. Good to see other perspectives.
Non Union; but what can I do?
I have always been non union. I was a factory worker until an unfortunate injury, which my non union company helped me with, and to this day stays in touch with me.
I have been seeing unions flexing their muscle in my local area against non union groceries I shop at and have good communication with. This happened just days after the election.
Mind you, these non union groceries highly support local American farmers and live stock.
Unionizing these groceries would bring many sub standard products, not support the local American workers who sell to these stores, charge higher prices, and we consumers will suffer.
My question being please... as an average consumer who is worried about this, what can I do to help put a stop to this madness? Can I actively protest? Can I spread literature about the horrors unions would bring that many other consumers don't see, just like the unions always do with fliers and literature in mass mailings?
Although I am now disabled, and a small consumer, I still stand against unions as I have seen in the past all the bad things they bring, although they preach a "mob mentality" rhetoric to appease the masses to win their support. What can I do to do my part to help is all I'm asking?
Thank you...
Kentucky!