You are trying to get technical, but missed it by a mile. Yes, it helps for the Pres. and VP to have been born in the USA. It is obvious that this requirement is meant to increase the likelihood of their being loyal to America. However, this does not prove that either would be loyal. On the other hand, it is also certainly possible that a foreign born person may be more loyal to America than a native born person. Therefore, the loyalty thing could go either way. The native born clause would work better if the requirement had been that the Pres. and VP to have had many ancestors that had been in the USA for several generations. Obama is unique in this situation. First, he has lied over and over about his eligibility and many other things, such as his college grades. Obama paid his lawyers more than TWO MILLION DOLLARS to not show his birth certificate and to cover-up other lies. The media has always supported his lies for the purpose of increasing there power and money. Another example, is his lie about not being a Muslim. Recently, Obama and his wife went on holiday to New England. His dog went too. However, the dog went in a DIFFERENT AIRPLANE at a very high cost to the taxpayers! What a coincidence that the Muslim religion requires that the dog go separately as dogs are considered to be "unclean"! Obama has told so many lies that he cannot keep up with them.
Yes, Arnold S. (Terminator) is not from this country; but he is much more loyal than Obama. Let's not forget Obama's hate America pastor and his admitted terrorist friend!